Search
Agricultural Soil Carbon Credits: Making sense of protocols for carbon sequestration and net greenhouse gas removals

Environmental Defense Fund | SourceDownload

Agriculture impacts climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and land use changes but also holds potential for mitigation through soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. Investment in SOC credits is increasing, yet there is an urgent need to evaluate and standardize SOC measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) protocols to ensure high-quality credits that accurately reflect net atmospheric carbon sequestration.

Key Findings

  • Protocol Variability: A review of 12 SOC MRV protocols reveals significant differences in quantification approaches: some use soil sampling, others combine sampling with modeling, or rely solely on modeling and remote sensing. Inconsistencies in estimating SOC and net GHG reductions can undermine the credibility and comparability of credits.
  • Quantification Challenges: Current protocols focus on practices like cover crops and reduced tillage but lack comprehensive data on SOC accrual across different practices and locations. Reliance on models and infrequent soil sampling introduces uncertainty in SOC estimates.
  • Structural Issues: Protocols vary in addressing additionality, leakage, reversals, and permanence, impacting the reliability of credits. Variations in protocol standards hinder the use of SOC credits for meeting nationally determined contributions (NDCs) or emissions offsets.

Recommendations

  • Standardize Protocols: Validate and compare SOC sequestration estimates across protocols to ensure consistency.
  • Scale Aggregation: Define and utilize appropriate scales for aggregation to reduce costs and manage risks.
  • Enhance Data: Develop open-access datasets for improved model calibration and baseline determination.
  • Invest in Technology: Support advancements in MRV technology to improve accuracy and scalability.

Conclusion: To effectively harness SOC sequestration for climate mitigation, it's crucial to address protocol inconsistencies, enhance research, and invest in technological advancements. These steps will ensure that SOC credits contribute meaningfully to climate goals while supporting farmers and agricultural sustainability.

Viewed Articles
Agricultural Soil Carbon Credits: Making sense of protocols for carbon sequestration and net greenhouse gas removals
Environmental Defense Fund | Source | Download | Agriculture impacts climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and land use changes but also holds potential for mitigation through soil organic c
Read More
VM0042 Methodology for Improved Agricultural Land Management v2.0
VERRA | Source | Download | Verra, a leading organization in voluntary carbon markets, developed the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) Program to ensure the credibility of GHG emission reductions. The ve
2024.08.27
Setting up and implementing result-based carbon farming mechanisms in the EU Technical guidance handbook
European Commission | Source | Download |  The Technical Guidance Handbook provides essential support for developing result-based payment schemes for carbon farming in the EU. Funded by the European C
EU Emissions Trading System: Explanatory guidance on the accreditation and verification regulation
European Commission | Source | Download | The European Commission's recent legislative proposals signal a robust commitment to achieving climate neutrality by 2050, with an interim target of a 55%
2024.05.17
Actions to transform food systems under climate change
CGIAR | Source  | Download | The current state of global food systems is inadequate, marked by failures in production, nutrition, equity, and environmental sustainability. Climate change exacerbates t
California Cap-and-Trade Program (USA)
California Air Resources Board | Source | Download | California's Cap-and-Trade Program is pivotal in the state's commitment to curbing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, aligning with Assembly B
2024.05.17
TOP