Search
Agricultural Soil Carbon Credits: Making sense of protocols for carbon sequestration and net greenhouse gas removals

Environmental Defense Fund | SourceDownload

Agriculture impacts climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and land use changes but also holds potential for mitigation through soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. Investment in SOC credits is increasing, yet there is an urgent need to evaluate and standardize SOC measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) protocols to ensure high-quality credits that accurately reflect net atmospheric carbon sequestration.

Key Findings

  • Protocol Variability: A review of 12 SOC MRV protocols reveals significant differences in quantification approaches: some use soil sampling, others combine sampling with modeling, or rely solely on modeling and remote sensing. Inconsistencies in estimating SOC and net GHG reductions can undermine the credibility and comparability of credits.
  • Quantification Challenges: Current protocols focus on practices like cover crops and reduced tillage but lack comprehensive data on SOC accrual across different practices and locations. Reliance on models and infrequent soil sampling introduces uncertainty in SOC estimates.
  • Structural Issues: Protocols vary in addressing additionality, leakage, reversals, and permanence, impacting the reliability of credits. Variations in protocol standards hinder the use of SOC credits for meeting nationally determined contributions (NDCs) or emissions offsets.

Recommendations

  • Standardize Protocols: Validate and compare SOC sequestration estimates across protocols to ensure consistency.
  • Scale Aggregation: Define and utilize appropriate scales for aggregation to reduce costs and manage risks.
  • Enhance Data: Develop open-access datasets for improved model calibration and baseline determination.
  • Invest in Technology: Support advancements in MRV technology to improve accuracy and scalability.

Conclusion: To effectively harness SOC sequestration for climate mitigation, it's crucial to address protocol inconsistencies, enhance research, and invest in technological advancements. These steps will ensure that SOC credits contribute meaningfully to climate goals while supporting farmers and agricultural sustainability.

Viewed Articles
Agricultural Soil Carbon Credits: Making sense of protocols for carbon sequestration and net greenhouse gas removals
Environmental Defense Fund | Source | Download | Agriculture impacts climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and land use changes but also holds potential for mitigation through soil organic c
Read More
OECD – Towards Interoperable Carbon Intensity Metrics
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) | Source | Report | This OECD report develops a practical framework to improve interoperability across carbon-intensity metrics, focusing
2025.12.10
EU Carbon Removal Certification Framework
European Commission | Source | Download | The EU Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF) is a crucial step in amplifying carbon removal efforts and combatting greenwashing. By providing a transp
2024.05.17
Outline of Specifications for Carbon Credit Market (Japan)
Japan Tokyo Stock Exchange | Source | Download | The Japanese government's commitment to carbon neutrality by 2050 has prompted the introduction of an emissions trading system, marking a significa
2024.05.17
A close look at the quality of REDD+ carbon credits
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit | Source | Download   | The use of carbon credits to offset greenhouse gas emissions is increasing among companies worldwide. However, evaluatin
A general assessment of the role of agriculture and forestry in the U.S. carbon markets
USDA| Source | Download |USDA responds to the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 by defining the role of agriculture and forestry in U.S. carbon markets. This analysis identifies key barriers and
TOP