Search
Co-benefits of forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia

February 10, 2022 | Nature Sustainability | Source |

Introduction: An international research team led by principal investigators from University of Adelaide in Australia and National University of Singapore finds forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia could offer substantial benefits beyond climate change mitigation. 

Key findings: By protecting 58% of threatened forests as carbon projects, the region could prevent 835 million tons of CO2 emissions annually, support pollination for agriculture benefiting around 324,000 people, retain 78% of nitrogen pollutants in watersheds, and conserve 25 million hectares of Key Biodiversity Areas. With 196 million hectares of tropical forests, many under threat, there's significant potential for these projects to contribute to climate goals, like those in the Paris Agreement.

Forests also play a crucial role in providing essential services such as pollination, water quality regulation, and biodiversity conservation. For example, forests near agricultural lands support pollinators crucial for crop production, and they help maintain water quality by absorbing nitrogen pollutants. Additionally, protecting forests helps conserve biodiversity hotspots.

The financial viability of these projects is influenced by carbon pricing. At a conservative carbon price of $5.80 per ton of CO2, about 114 million hectares of forests could be protected. If carbon prices increase, the benefits—such as climate mitigation, crop pollination, water quality, and biodiversity conservation—would also rise. Investments in forest conservation could thus align with global climate and development goals, including those related to food security, clean water, and sustainable development. Overall, forest carbon projects offer a financially viable and effective approach to addressing a range of socio-economic and environmental challenges.

Figure | Co-benefits attained within profitable forest carbon areas at a carbon price of US$5.80 per tCO2e. a, Climate mitigation potential. b, Pollination service. c, Freshwater service. d, KBAs. e, Spatial overlay of any level of co-benefits attained within profitable forest carbon areas. Yellow represents areas that are profitable for carbon, areas in blue provide one co-benefit in addition to carbon, areas in green provide two other co-benefits and areas in pink provide three co-benefits in addition to carbon.

Viewed Articles
Co-benefits of forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia
February 10, 2022 | Nature Sustainability | Source | Introduction: An international research team led by principal investigators from University of Adelaide in Australia and National University of Sin
Read More
Climate change and the urgency to transform food systems
June 23, 2022 | Science |  Introduction: Without rapid changes to agriculture and food systems, the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement will not be met. In this review, researchers led by the University
A conceptual framework for understanding the environmental impacts of ultra-processed foods and implications for sustainable food systems
September 25, 2022 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source |  Introduction: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) exacerbate the global food system’s failure by driving environmental harm, undermining nutriti
Greenhouse gas emission from rice fields: a review from Indian context
April 27, 2021 | Environmental Science and Pollution Research | Source |  Introduction: This review, led by scientists from the Department of Environmental Sciences at Central University of Jharkhand
Opportunities for mitigating net system greenhouse gas emissions in Southeast Asian rice production: A systematic review
February 28, 2024 | Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | Source |  Introduction: Despite existing mitigation efforts, integrated approaches addressing system-wide emissions—including soil organic c
Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health
January 3, 2024 | Nature Communications | Source | Introduction: Conventional intensive farming boosts yields but also drives GHG emissions, soil degradation, and climate vulnerability, especially in
TOP