Search
Co-benefits of forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia

February 10, 2022 | Nature Sustainability | Source |

Introduction: An international research team led by principal investigators from University of Adelaide in Australia and National University of Singapore finds forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia could offer substantial benefits beyond climate change mitigation. 

Key findings: By protecting 58% of threatened forests as carbon projects, the region could prevent 835 million tons of CO2 emissions annually, support pollination for agriculture benefiting around 324,000 people, retain 78% of nitrogen pollutants in watersheds, and conserve 25 million hectares of Key Biodiversity Areas. With 196 million hectares of tropical forests, many under threat, there's significant potential for these projects to contribute to climate goals, like those in the Paris Agreement.

Forests also play a crucial role in providing essential services such as pollination, water quality regulation, and biodiversity conservation. For example, forests near agricultural lands support pollinators crucial for crop production, and they help maintain water quality by absorbing nitrogen pollutants. Additionally, protecting forests helps conserve biodiversity hotspots.

The financial viability of these projects is influenced by carbon pricing. At a conservative carbon price of $5.80 per ton of CO2, about 114 million hectares of forests could be protected. If carbon prices increase, the benefits—such as climate mitigation, crop pollination, water quality, and biodiversity conservation—would also rise. Investments in forest conservation could thus align with global climate and development goals, including those related to food security, clean water, and sustainable development. Overall, forest carbon projects offer a financially viable and effective approach to addressing a range of socio-economic and environmental challenges.

Figure | Co-benefits attained within profitable forest carbon areas at a carbon price of US$5.80 per tCO2e. a, Climate mitigation potential. b, Pollination service. c, Freshwater service. d, KBAs. e, Spatial overlay of any level of co-benefits attained within profitable forest carbon areas. Yellow represents areas that are profitable for carbon, areas in blue provide one co-benefit in addition to carbon, areas in green provide two other co-benefits and areas in pink provide three co-benefits in addition to carbon.

Viewed Articles
Co-benefits of forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia
February 10, 2022 | Nature Sustainability | Source | Introduction: An international research team led by principal investigators from University of Adelaide in Australia and National University of Sin
Read More
Crop pest responses to global changes in climate and land management
April 8, 2025 | Nature Reviews Earth & Environment  Introduction: This review led by researchers at Hebei University and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) explains how global change
Fully bio-based polyurethane coating for environmentally friendly controlled release fertilizer: Construction, degradation mechanism and effect on plant growth
Introduction: Controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs) can improve nutrient-use efficiency by gradually releasing nutrients according to crop demand. However, conventional CRFs commonly use petroleum-bas
Optimizing cover crop practices as a sustainable solution for global agroecosystem services
November 14, 2024 | Nature Communications | Introduction: Cover crops offer multiple agroecosystem benefits including higher yields, soil carbon storage, and erosion control, but their net value is co
Methodologies of control strategies for improving energy efficiency in agricultural greenhouses
November 20, 2020 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Introduction: Greenhouses account for the largest share of final energy consumption in agriculture, with heating alone consuming 65-85% of total ene
Optimal sizing of a grid-connected DC microgrid for agricultural applications with water-energy management system considering battery cycle life
June 2025 |Energy Nexus |Volume 18Introduction: Agricultural irrigation is becoming increasingly costly and carbon-intensive as farms continue to rely on grid electricity and diesel-powered pumping. W
TOP