Search
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced irrigation water use in rice production through water-saving irrigation scheduling, reduced tillage and fertiliser application strategies

October 15, 2020 | Science of The Total Environment | Source |  

Introduction: Rice production in Asia accounts for 75% of the global supply but is highly vulnerable to climate change, with rising temperatures, altered rainfall, and increased weeds, pests, and diseases potentially reducing yields by up to 50% by 2100 without effective mitigation and adaptation strategies. Developing sustainable agronomic technologies is therefore crucial to enhance productivity and resource-use efficiency in rice farming. This study examined the effects of water-saving irrigation practices (safe alternate wetting and drying, AWD vs. soil water potential scheduling, SWP), land preparation methods (puddling vs. non-puddled reduced tillage), and fertilizer application techniques (broadcast vs. liquid fertilization) on water-use efficiency, GHG emissions, and rice yield. Conducted in the Philippines by researchers from Wageningen University, the University of Copenhagen, IRRI, and ACIAR, the randomized complete block experiment included eight treatments combining the above three factors, with four replicates, to evaluate sustainable rice production practices.

 

Key findings: The results showed that Broadcast-AWD achieved the highest yield, 20% more than Liquid fertilizer-AWD, while Broadcast-SWP delivered comparable yields with 15% less water use. Liquid fertilizer under SWP showed lower yields due to nitrogen leaching and limited uptake, whereas reduced tillage under SWP saved additional water during land preparation. Methane (CHâ‚„) emissions were 73–86% lower in AWD and SWP compared to conventional flooded systems. SWP reduced CHâ‚„ emissions by 33% compared to AWD, aided by improved soil aeration and fewer flooding periods. Liquid fertilization lowered CHâ‚„ emissions by 25% under AWD and 21% under SWP. Nitrous oxide (Nâ‚‚O) emissions were higher in AWD due to aerobic conditions promoting nitrification, but SWP reduced Nâ‚‚O emissions by 64–66% through consistent soil moisture and minimized emission peaks. Overall, global warming potential (GWP) decreased by 51% under AWD and 76% under SWP, with Broadcast-SWP achieving the lowest emissions due to significant reductions in Nâ‚‚O.

This research concludes that improved water management and precise nitrogen application can minimize water use and reduce Nâ‚‚O and CHâ‚„ emissions with minimal impact on yield. SWP irrigation is a water-efficient, climate-smart method that reduces emissions through controlled aerobic-anaerobic transitions. Despite its higher initial costs and complexity, it delivers low emissions and yields comparable to AWD, making it a more sustainable option from this study. AWD, meanwhile, is a low-tech, cost-effective, and easily adaptable technique suitable for smallholder farmers. Further long-term studies under diverse environmental conditions, such as groundwater measurements, are recommended to fully assess these approaches.

 

Graphical Abstract

Viewed Articles
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced irrigation water use in rice production through water-saving irrigation scheduling, reduced tillage and fertiliser application strategies
October 15, 2020 | Science of The Total Environment | Source |  Introduction: Rice production in Asia accounts for 75% of the global supply but is highly vulnerable to climate change, with rising temp
Read More
Methane and nitrous oxide emissions in rice fields influenced with duration of cultivars and irrigation regimes
May 1, 2024 | Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | Source |  Introduction: Rice cultivation in Punjab, India, has increased by 56% over the last three decades, severely depleting groundwater reserv
Climate mitigation efficacy of anaerobic digestion in a decarbonising economy
January 10, 2022 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source | Introduction: Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a crucial technology at the intersection of waste management, energy production, and land use. An
Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world
May 1, 2023 | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | Source | Introduction: Decarbonizing industries like steelmaking, cement production, and chemicals is challenging due to the limited availabili
Biochar for agronomy, animal farming, anaerobic digestion, composting, water treatment, soil remediation, construction, energy storage, and carbon sequestration: a review
May 7, 2022 | Environmental Chemistry Letters | Source | Introduction: Biochar, a recycled material created from organic waste, has diverse applications across various sectors due to its role in clima
Co-benefits of forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia
February 10, 2022 | Nature Sustainability | Source | Introduction: An international research team led by principal investigators from University of Adelaide in Australia and National University of Sin
TOP