Search
The potential of biochar incorporation into agricultural soils to promote sustainable agriculture: Insights from soil health, crop productivity, greenhouse gas emission mitigation and feasibility perspectives—A critical review

November 11, 2024 | Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology | Source |

 

Introduction: Addressing the growing threat of soil degradation, researchers from the University of Prince Edward Island in Canada and Jiangsu University in China conducted a critical review of over 100 studies on biochar—a carbon-rich material from pyrolyzed biomass—providing an integrated analysis of biochar’s effects on soil health, crop productivity, GHG mitigation, and economic viability.

Key findings: Biochar improves soil physical properties by enhancing soil porosity (SP) and reducing bulk density (BD), leading to better water infiltration and retention, and making soil more resilient. Chemically, it raises pH in acidic soils, boosts cation exchange capacity (CEC) and organic carbon levels, and improves nutrient availability while reducing leaching and immobilizing heavy metals. Biologically, biochar fosters microbial growth and activity by providing a supportive habitat, though effects vary with soil type and biochar characteristics.

Incorporating biochar into soil can boost crop yields by 10-16% by enhancing soil properties and nutrient availability. However, results vary with soil type, crop species, and biochar characteristics. Biochar also mitigates GHG emissions by stabilizing soil carbon, reducing Nâ‚‚O through effects on nitrification and denitrification, and lowering CHâ‚„—especially in flooded soils—by enhancing microbial processes and enabling slow-release fertilization. Economic feasibility depends on whether yield gains and input savings outweigh the costs of production, transport, and application, which vary by region and crop. Carbon market incentives can further enhance viability.

Key research gaps include optimizing biochar for specific soils, conducting long-term field studies, and assessing large-scale environmental impacts. Future work should prioritize cost–benefit analyses, farmer guidance, and meta-analyses to support broader, sustainable adoption.

 

Graphical abstract

Viewed Articles
The potential of biochar incorporation into agricultural soils to promote sustainable agriculture: Insights from soil health, crop productivity, greenhouse gas emission mitigation and feasibility perspectives—A critical review
November 11, 2024 | Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology | Source |  Introduction: Addressing the growing threat of soil degradation, researchers from the University of Prince Edward Is
Read More
Opportunities for mitigating net system greenhouse gas emissions in Southeast Asian rice production: A systematic review
February 28, 2024 | Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | Source | Introduction: Southeast Asia (SEA) produces 28% of global rice. As flooded rice fields account for nearly half of global crop-relat
Toward Low-Carbon Rice Production in China: Historical Changes, Driving Factors, and Mitigation Potential
March 19, 2024 | Environmental Science & Technology | Source |  Introduction: This study, conducted by researchers from Hunan University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, evaluates the historical c
Soil carbon sequestration increment and carbon-negative emissions in alternate wetting and drying paddy ecosystems through biochar incorporation
July 1, 2024 | Agricultural Water Management | Source |  Introduction: Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) is a widely adopted water-saving irrigation technique in Asian rice-producing countries that i
Addressing dairy industry's scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions by efficiently managing farm carbon footprints
April, 2023 | Environmental Challenges | Source |  Introduction: Upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (i.e. scope 3)—accounting for 70–90% of the dairy industry’s total emissions—pose a persistent
Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation in rice agriculture
September 26, 2023 | Nature Reviews Earth & Environment | Source | Introduction: This collaborative review, conducted by researchers from 3 universities in China, University of Exeter (UK), UC Davis,
TOP