Search
How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal
Sources of information

August 30, 2019 | Global Change Biology |

 

Introduction: This paper is produced by an international consortium of researchers across Europe, North America, Oceania and Africa, reflecting broad expertise in soil science, modelling and land-based mitigation. The study emphasizes the global significance of soil carbon, noting that soils contain a carbon stock larger than the atmosphere and therefore represent a major potential avenue for climate mitigation. It evaluates current methods for measuring, reporting and verifying (MRV) changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) and outlines how improved MRV can support national and international climate strategies.

 

Key findings: SOC is difficult to monitor because changes occur slowly within a large and variable soil carbon pool. Direct sampling remains the most accurate method but becomes costly when deeper sampling is required to detect management impacts. The review notes that practices such as no-till often require sampling close to one meter and adjustments for changing soil bulk density. Flux measurements can complement sampling but are less reliable over short periods, becoming more informative only when monitored over longer time frames.

Models help scale MRV but face important uncertainties. Many models cannot fully represent key soil processes or carbon pools with long turnover times, and carbon-input estimates based on simplified relationships add further uncertainty. The review also highlights uneven MRV capacity across countries. Many developing nations rely on lower-tier reporting due to limited national soil data, reinforcing the need for international cooperation, capacity building and more harmonized approaches.

The authors present an integrated MRV vision that combines benchmark sites, calibrated models, spatial databases and repeat soil surveys supported by remote sensing to meet national reporting and market needs. This framework is intended to support major international initiatives to increase soil carbon, including the 4p1000 initiative and FAO’s global SOC sequestration assessments.

 

Viewed Articles
How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal
August 30, 2019 | Global Change Biology |  Introduction: This paper is produced by an international consortium of researchers across Europe, North America, Oceania and Africa, reflecting broad experti
Read More
Statistical inference method for Korean low-carbon certificate criteria of agricultural products to reflect uncertain conditions
April 20, 2023 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source | Introduction: South Korea aims to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 7.9% by 2030 in agriculture, forestry, and livestock industries, an
Quantifying the impact of climate smart agricultural practices on soil carbon storage relative to conventional management
January 15, 2024 | Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | Introduction: Claims that climate-smart agricultural practices sequester atmospheric carbon more effectively than conventional approaches lack
Impact of agricultural management practices on soil carbon sequestration and its monitoring through simulation models and remote sensing techniques: A review
August 27, 2020 | Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology |  Introduction: Led by an India-based team from Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, the Indian Institute of Remote Sensing
Eating healthy or wasting less? Reducing resource footprints of food consumption
April 29, 2021 | Environmental Research Letters | Source |  Introduction: Researchers from the University of Freiburg and University of Kassel (Germany), together with the Vienna University of Economi
Toward a framework for selecting indicators of measuring sustainability and circular economy in the agri-food sector: a systematic literature review
March 2, 2022 | The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Source | Introduction: An Italy-based research team from the University of Tuscia and University of Rome conducted a systematic lit
TOP