Search
Mainstreaming blended finance in climate-smart agriculture: Complementarity, modality, and proximity

May 6, 2022 | Journal of Rural Studies |

 

Introduction: Scaling climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is constrained by high investment risks, limited commercial bank engagement, and fragmented institutional support. Scholars based in Indian Institute of Management and XIM University examine why blended finance has not become a mainstream financing model for CSA, using an integrated fish farming project in Odisha, India, as a case study. The study applies an institutional and governance perspective to analyze how financial design and actor relationships shape implementation outcomes.

 

Key findings: The study argues that blended finance remains non-mainstream in agriculture partly because it skews toward many small deals: agriculture accounts for 22% of blended-finance transactions but only 9% of transaction volumes, signalling persistent fragmentation and weak scalability. The authors explain mainstreaming barriers through governance and moral preferences: mainstream investors often treat economic productivity as the moral compass, while impact investors prioritize social/ecological outcomes, creating hard-to-align expectations across actors.

Using the Integrated Fish Farming (IFF) case in Odisha, India, the paper shows how institutional frictions can stall scale-up: local banks hesitate due to procedural restrictions, while the implementing agency finds incentives unattractive and feels overloaded by frequent monitoring. In practice, progress depended on proximity and role complementarity—a locally embedded implementer (Gram-Utthan) identifying beneficiaries and liaising with communities, supported by NABARD and GIZ through grants, technical assistance, and capacity-building. The IFF blending described relied mainly on concessional credit, grants, and community contributions, without highlighting dedicated risk-sharing tools (e.g., guarantees/insurance) that are often discussed as blended-finance components—an important design consideration for climate-exposed farming contexts.

 

Figure | Conceptual Framework explaining the mainstreaming phenomenon.

Viewed Articles
Mainstreaming blended finance in climate-smart agriculture: Complementarity, modality, and proximity
May 6, 2022 | Journal of Rural Studies |  Introduction: Scaling climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is constrained by high investment risks, limited commercial bank engagement, and fragmented institutiona
Read More
Incentive mechanisms of carbon farming contracts: A systematic mapping study
February 14, 2024 | Journal of Environmental Management |  Introduction: A research team from the University of Bologna and the University of Urbino Carlo Bo in Italy conducts a systematic mapping stu
A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes
October 12, 2020 | Nature Sustainability |  Introduction: An international research team led by researchers from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), in collaboration with multila
Challenges and prospects for agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation pathways consistent with the Paris Agreement
May 22, 2020 | Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems |  Introduction: Global pathways consistent with the Paris Agreement rely on substantial reductions in agricultural methane (CH4) and N2O alongside
Climate-smart agroforestry systems and practices: A systematic review of what works, what doesn’t work, and why
May, 2023 | Forest Policy and Economics | Source | Introduction: Climate-smart agroforestry (CSAF) practices offer integrated solutions to climate change, food security, and environmental degradation,
Prospects for integration of carbon and biodiversity credits: an Australian case study review
November 12, 2024 | Sustainability Science |  Introduction: This review, conducted by an international research team from Queensland University of Technology and the University of Queensland in Austra
TOP