Search
Mainstreaming blended finance in climate-smart agriculture: Complementarity, modality, and proximity

May 6, 2022 | Journal of Rural Studies |

 

Introduction: Scaling climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is constrained by high investment risks, limited commercial bank engagement, and fragmented institutional support. Scholars based in Indian Institute of Management and XIM University examine why blended finance has not become a mainstream financing model for CSA, using an integrated fish farming project in Odisha, India, as a case study. The study applies an institutional and governance perspective to analyze how financial design and actor relationships shape implementation outcomes.

 

Key findings: The study argues that blended finance remains non-mainstream in agriculture partly because it skews toward many small deals: agriculture accounts for 22% of blended-finance transactions but only 9% of transaction volumes, signalling persistent fragmentation and weak scalability. The authors explain mainstreaming barriers through governance and moral preferences: mainstream investors often treat economic productivity as the moral compass, while impact investors prioritize social/ecological outcomes, creating hard-to-align expectations across actors.

Using the Integrated Fish Farming (IFF) case in Odisha, India, the paper shows how institutional frictions can stall scale-up: local banks hesitate due to procedural restrictions, while the implementing agency finds incentives unattractive and feels overloaded by frequent monitoring. In practice, progress depended on proximity and role complementarity—a locally embedded implementer (Gram-Utthan) identifying beneficiaries and liaising with communities, supported by NABARD and GIZ through grants, technical assistance, and capacity-building. The IFF blending described relied mainly on concessional credit, grants, and community contributions, without highlighting dedicated risk-sharing tools (e.g., guarantees/insurance) that are often discussed as blended-finance components—an important design consideration for climate-exposed farming contexts.

 

Figure | Conceptual Framework explaining the mainstreaming phenomenon.

Viewed Articles
Mainstreaming blended finance in climate-smart agriculture: Complementarity, modality, and proximity
May 6, 2022 | Journal of Rural Studies |  Introduction: Scaling climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is constrained by high investment risks, limited commercial bank engagement, and fragmented institutiona
Read More
Tailoring Australian carbon farming can realise greater co-benefits
January 20, 2026 | Nature Communications |  Introduction: This study, led by the Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture at the University of Tasmania (Australia) with participation from industry and resea
Harness agrifood value chains to help farmers be climate smart: Incentives and structures exist to improve farming practices
November 28, 2024 | Science | Source |  Introduction: At the 2023 COP28, the Emirates Declaration recognized the critical role of agrifood systems in addressing climate change. With over 160 countries
A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes
October 12, 2020 | Nature Sustainability |  Introduction: An international research team led by researchers from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), in collaboration with multila
Climate and carbon policy pathways for sustainable food systems
September, 2025 | Environmental and Sustainability Indicators |  Introduction: Carbon pricing and related climate policies are increasingly positioned as core levers for decarbonizing food systems, ye
Improving ecosystem services in farmlands: beginning of a long-term ecological study with restored flower-rich grasslands
June 20, 2022 | Ecosystem Health and Sustainability |Introduction: Grassland restoration research lacks landscape-scale studies, long-term monitoring of successional processes, and diverse native seed
TOP