Search
Ending extreme poverty has a negligible impact on global greenhouse gas emissions

November 29, 2023 | Nature 

Introduction: While eradicating poverty has historically led to modest increases in global emissions, World Bank researchers re-examine the historical relationships between consumption, economic growth, and energy/carbon intensity to determine if poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation are compatable goals. The research estimates the economic growth needed to reduce extreme poverty to 3% globally, considering different poverty lines. 

Key findings: To achieve economic growth needed to reduce extreme poverty to 3% globally, the estimated increase in carbon emissions would vary based on the poverty line. Alleviating extreme poverty, even at middle-income standards, can be prioritized without significantly affecting climate objectives. While there may be some trade-offs in specific policies, there are more synergies than conflicts between poverty alleviation and climate objectives, especially with advancements in renewable energy and efficiency measures.

The World Bank research highlights the need for policies that reduce energy intensities, carbon intensities to address the challenges of poverty and climate change simultaneously.

 Read more

Fig. | Emissions of poverty alleviation. a, Annual CO2e increase of poverty reduction at three poverty lines (percentage of 2019 global emissions) by region, b, Emissions of poverty alleviation in 2050 by country. The bar width of each country is scaled to their population in 2019. The yellow areas show the CO2e needed to end extreme poverty in 2050, expressed relative to the emissions of the country in 2019. The sum of the blue and yellow areas shows the CO2e needed to reach the target poverty rate of 3% at $3.65, and equivalently for $6.85. tCO2e, tonne carbon dioxide equivalent. BGD, Bangladesh; ETH, Ethiopia; NGA, Nigeria; PAK, Pakistan; PHL, Philippines; IND, India; EGY, Egypt; VNM, Vietnam; MEX, Mexico; TUR, Turkey; BRA, Brazil; IDN, Indonesia; COD, Democratic Republic of the Congo; CHN, China; DEU, Germany; JPN, Japan; IRN, Iran; RUS, Russia; USA, United States of America. 

Viewed Articles
Ending extreme poverty has a negligible impact on global greenhouse gas emissions
November 29, 2023 | Nature |  Introduction: While eradicating poverty has historically led to modest increases in global emissions, World Bank researchers re-examine the historical relationships betwe
Read More
Addressing dairy industry's scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions by efficiently managing farm carbon footprints
April, 2023 | Environmental Challenges | Source |  Introduction: Upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (i.e. scope 3)—accounting for 70–90% of the dairy industry’s total emissions—pose a persistent
A hybrid sustainability performance measurement approach for fresh food cold supply chains
April 20, 2023 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source |  Introduction: Fresh food cold supply chains (CSCs) in developing countries face major sustainability issues, including food waste, high energ
Design considerations for net zero energy buildings for intensive, confined poultry production: A review of current insights, knowledge gaps, and future directions
February, 2022 | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | Introduction: Poultry housing may account for up to 50% of total non-renewable energy use and 20-35% of the life cycle impacts of poultry pr
Climate change and livestock production: a literature review
January 15, 2022 | Atmosphere | Source | Introduction: Livestock both drives and suffers from climate change, contributing 14.5% of global GHG emissions while facing growing climate-induced stress. Re
Conversion of food waste to energy: A focus on sustainability and life cycle assessment
October 15, 2021 | Fuel | Source | Introduction: A research team from SRM Institute of Science and Technology and Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering in India reviews sustainable pathways
TOP