Search
Ending extreme poverty has a negligible impact on global greenhouse gas emissions

November 29, 2023 | Nature 

Introduction: While eradicating poverty has historically led to modest increases in global emissions, World Bank researchers re-examine the historical relationships between consumption, economic growth, and energy/carbon intensity to determine if poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation are compatable goals. The research estimates the economic growth needed to reduce extreme poverty to 3% globally, considering different poverty lines. 

Key findings: To achieve economic growth needed to reduce extreme poverty to 3% globally, the estimated increase in carbon emissions would vary based on the poverty line. Alleviating extreme poverty, even at middle-income standards, can be prioritized without significantly affecting climate objectives. While there may be some trade-offs in specific policies, there are more synergies than conflicts between poverty alleviation and climate objectives, especially with advancements in renewable energy and efficiency measures.

The World Bank research highlights the need for policies that reduce energy intensities, carbon intensities to address the challenges of poverty and climate change simultaneously.

 Read more

Fig. | Emissions of poverty alleviation. a, Annual CO2e increase of poverty reduction at three poverty lines (percentage of 2019 global emissions) by region, b, Emissions of poverty alleviation in 2050 by country. The bar width of each country is scaled to their population in 2019. The yellow areas show the CO2e needed to end extreme poverty in 2050, expressed relative to the emissions of the country in 2019. The sum of the blue and yellow areas shows the CO2e needed to reach the target poverty rate of 3% at $3.65, and equivalently for $6.85. tCO2e, tonne carbon dioxide equivalent. BGD, Bangladesh; ETH, Ethiopia; NGA, Nigeria; PAK, Pakistan; PHL, Philippines; IND, India; EGY, Egypt; VNM, Vietnam; MEX, Mexico; TUR, Turkey; BRA, Brazil; IDN, Indonesia; COD, Democratic Republic of the Congo; CHN, China; DEU, Germany; JPN, Japan; IRN, Iran; RUS, Russia; USA, United States of America. 

Viewed Articles
Ending extreme poverty has a negligible impact on global greenhouse gas emissions
November 29, 2023 | Nature |  Introduction: While eradicating poverty has historically led to modest increases in global emissions, World Bank researchers re-examine the historical relationships betwe
Read More
Greenhouse gas emission from rice fields: a review from Indian context
April 27, 2021 | Environmental Science and Pollution Research | Source |  Introduction: This review, led by scientists from the Department of Environmental Sciences at Central University of Jharkhand
A conceptual framework for understanding the environmental impacts of ultra-processed foods and implications for sustainable food systems
September 25, 2022 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source |  Introduction: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) exacerbate the global food system’s failure by driving environmental harm, undermining nutriti
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in pasture-based dairy-beef production systems
October, 2023 | Agricultural Systems | Source |  Introduction: Ireland’s beef sector, responsible for 37% of national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, presents key opportunities for climate mitigation
Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of perishable food products delivered by the cold chain in China
June 20, 2021 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source | Introduction: Researchers from the University of Michigan (USA) analyzed the lifecycle GHG emissions of perishable foods—vegetables, fruits, me
Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration in organic dehesa livestock farms. Does technical-economic management matters?
October 20, 2022 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source |  Introduction: While organic livestock systems are often hailed as environmentally friendly, their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon
TOP