Search
Decarbonizing the food and beverages industry: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options

June 01, 2021 | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 

Introduction: The UK research team led by Sussex Business School collaborates with individual researchers from the US, United Arab Emirates, Republic of Korea to assess food and beverage sector's carbon footprint and explores decarbonization strategies through a thorough interdisciplinary review, aiming for a more sustainable future.

Key findings: The energy and carbon footprints of the food and beverage industry are substantial, spanning from farm to fork. Fossil-fuel-based farming practices, livestock production, and food processing contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Transporting food over long distances further exacerbates environmental impacts. Energy-intensive processes like refrigeration and cooking also add to the industry's footprint.

The decarbonization of the sector involves various technological innovations and practices across different stages of the supply chain. In agriculture, options include improved land management, precision agriculture, and decentralized food production. Food and beverage manufacturing can benefit from automation, process optimization, renewable energy adoption, and sustainable packaging. Similarly, energy-efficient practices and waste reduction strategies are essential in food retail and distribution. Consumer behavior changes, such as adopting plant-based diets and reducing food waste, also contribute to decarbonization. Emerging breakthroughs like precision biology offer potential transformative impacts.

Decarbonizing the food and beverages industry holds significant benefits across multiple fronts, including energy and carbon savings, cost reductions, environmental protection, and improvements in worker health and satisfaction. However, there exist notable barriers to decarbonization, including financial constraints, organizational challenges, and consumer behavior patterns favoring carbon-intensive products. Various policy instruments, ranging from emissions trading systems to targeted incentives for low-carbon products, can play a crucial role in driving industry-wide decarbonization efforts. 

Read more

Fig. | Interventions, benefits, barriers and policies for decarbonizing the food and beverage sociotechnical system.

 

Viewed Articles
Decarbonizing the food and beverages industry: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options
June 01, 2021 | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews |  Introduction: The UK research team led by Sussex Business School collaborates with individual researchers from the US, United Arab Emirates,
Read More
Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of perishable food products delivered by the cold chain in China
June 20, 2021 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source | Introduction: Researchers from the University of Michigan (USA) analyzed the lifecycle GHG emissions of perishable foods—vegetables, fruits, me
Tailoring Australian carbon farming can realise greater co-benefits
January 20, 2026 | Nature Communications |  Introduction: This study, led by the Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture at the University of Tasmania (Australia) with participation from industry and resea
Climate change and livestock production: a literature review
January 15, 2022 | Atmosphere | Source | Introduction: Livestock both drives and suffers from climate change, contributing 14.5% of global GHG emissions while facing growing climate-induced stress. Re
Cradle-to-grave emissions from food loss and waste represent half of total greenhouse gas emissions from food systems
March 13, 2023 | Nature Food | Source |  Introduction: Food loss and waste (FLW) are major contributors to global GHG emissions, yet their full impact across the food system has been underexplored. A
Potential soil organic carbon sequestration vis-a-vis methane emission in lowland rice agroecosystem
August 26, 2023 | Environmental Monitoring and Assessment |  Introduction: Lowland rice systems present a well-known climate trade-off, as management practices that increase soil organic carbon (SOC)
TOP