Search
Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands

January 04, 2023 | Nature |

Introduction: Croplands globally serve as a significant contributor to nitrogen pollution, posing a formidable challenge due to its non-point-source nature and various constraints hindering pollution-reduction efforts. A Chinese research team led by Zhejiang University in China, with the help of collaborators from Australia, Austria, Netherlands, Germany, and UK, has reviewed 1,521 field observations worldwide to identify measures for controlling nitrogen pollution. 

Key findings: The research has identified 11 key measures capable of curbing nitrogen losses from croplands by 30–70%, while simultaneously boosting crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency by 10–30% and 10–80%, respectively. Implementing this comprehensive set of measures on a global scale could yield remarkable results: producing 20% more crop nitrogen, while using 21% less nitrogen fertilizer and emitting 32% less nitrogen pollution by 2015 standards. Moreover, the societal benefits are substantial, estimated at 476 ± 123 billion US dollars, outweighing the mitigation costs (19 ± 5 billion USD). Notably, significant economic gains stem from reduced premature mortality, primarily by averting respiratory diseases due to PM2.5 pollution, alongside preservation of ecosystem services. Climate impacts, although minimal at −2 ± 1 billion USD, underscore the importance of considering potential drawbacks in improved cropland nitrogen management. Innovative policies like a nitrogen credit system could play a pivotal role in promoting and subsidizing the adoption of these measures, thus ushering in a more sustainable future for global agriculture. However, improved cropland nitrogen management could possibly affect carbon sequestration and exacerbating global warming in some regions (Read more).

 

Figure | Changes in global N budget in croplands with the best adoption of the 11 selected measures. a, Total N input. b, Harvested N. c, NH3 emission. D, N2O emission. E, Nox emission. F, N leaching and runoff. G, N fertilizer use. H, NUE. The base year is 2015 and the changes are calculated on the basis of the differences between the N fluxes in 2015 before and after the implementation of the most appropriate set of measures at the national level. The changes in NUE are in percentage points; for instance, the NUE increased by 17 percentage points in China. The base map is applied without endorsement from GADM data (https://gadm.org/).

Viewed Articles
Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands
January 04, 2023 | Nature |Introduction: Croplands globally serve as a significant contributor to nitrogen pollution, posing a formidable challenge due to its non-point-source nature and various const
Read More
Enhancing agroecosystem nitrogen management: microbial insights for improved nitrification inhibition
June, 2024 | Trends in Microbiology | Source |  Introduction: Excessive nitrification in agroecosystems causes nitrate leaching and N₂O emissions. Although nitrification inhibitors (NIs) reduce nitrog
Climate change and the urgency to transform food systems
June 23, 2022 | Science |  Introduction: Without rapid changes to agriculture and food systems, the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement will not be met. In this review, researchers led by the University
Livestock greenhouse gas emission and mitigation potential in China
December 15, 2023 | Journal of Environmental Management | Source |  Introduction: Livestock production is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) in China, challenging the country’s 20
Future carbon emissions from global mangrove forest loss
February 28, 2021 | Global Change Biology | Source |  Introduction: Mangroves significantly contribute to global climate mitigation by storing substantial carbon, yet their continuous loss poses major
Tailoring Australian carbon farming can realise greater co-benefits
January 20, 2026 | Nature Communications |  Introduction: This study, led by the Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture at the University of Tasmania (Australia) with participation from industry and resea
TOP