Search
Energy flow modeling and life cycle assessment of apple juice production: Recommendations for renewable energies implementation and climate change mitigation

February 10, 2020 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source |

Introduction: The demand for food due to population growth has led to the industrialization of food production, particularly in sectors like apple juice production. However, this shift has resulted in increased energy consumption, primarily from fossil fuels, leading to environmental risks for both human health and ecosystems. To address this issue, it's crucial to pinpoint the key areas of energy consumption and environmental impact within food production systems to enhance their efficiency and sustainability.A recent study led by University of Tehran in Iran focused on analyzing the energy consumption and environmental impacts of apple juice production in Iran's West Azarbaijan province. Using energy flow and life cycle assessment (LCA) methods, researchers traced the energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions from the farm gate to the packaging of bottled juice. 

Key findings: The study revealed that apple juice production consumes approximately 28.33 megajoules of energy per bottle, with diesel fuel, natural gas, and polyethylene terephthalate bottles being major contributors. Moreover, the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions were estimated at 1.83 kilograms of CO2 equivalent, primarily attributed to diesel and natural gas combustion.

Additionally, the study identified significant environmental impacts, such as acidification and eutrophication, mainly stemming from agricultural practices like fertilizer and pesticide use. Chemical fertilizers and farmyard manure contributed most to acidification and eutrophication, while pesticides were prominent in other impact categories like human toxicity and aquatic ecotoxicity.

The findings suggest potential strategies to mitigate environmental burdens, including the use of bio-fertilizers, biological control methods in agriculture, and the adoption of renewable energy technologies in the juicing process. These measures could help reduce the environmental footprint of apple juice production, promoting sustainability in the food industry.

 

Figure | Contributions of various inputs to the normalized environmental impact categories in the second phase of apple juice production.

Viewed Articles
Energy flow modeling and life cycle assessment of apple juice production: Recommendations for renewable energies implementation and climate change mitigation
February 10, 2020 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source | Introduction: The demand for food due to population growth has led to the industrialization of food production, particularly in sectors lik
Read More
A hybrid sustainability performance measurement approach for fresh food cold supply chains
April 20, 2023 | Journal of Cleaner Production | Source |  Introduction: Fresh food cold supply chains (CSCs) in developing countries face major sustainability issues, including food waste, high energ
Challenges and prospects for agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation pathways consistent with the Paris Agreement
May 22, 2020 | Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems |  Introduction: Global pathways consistent with the Paris Agreement rely on substantial reductions in agricultural methane (CH4) and N2O alongside
Optimized agricultural management reduces global cropland nitrogen losses to air and water
November 12, 2024 | Nature Food | Source |  Introduction: While nitrogen (N) inputs are essential for crop productivity, N losses from croplands contribute to major environmental issues, including cli
Pre- and post-production processes increasingly dominate greenhouse gas emissions from agri-food systems
April 14, 2022 | Earth System Science Data | Source | Introduction: Traditional assessments have underestimated global GHG emissions from agrifood systems by focusing mainly on farm-level production a
Climate change and the urgency to transform food systems
June 23, 2022 | Science |  Introduction: Without rapid changes to agriculture and food systems, the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement will not be met. In this review, researchers led by the University
TOP