Search
2024-03-29
Pricing Agricultural Emissions and Rewarding Climate Action in the Agri-food Value Chain

European Commission| Source Download

Introduction: Commissioned by the Commission’s Directorate General for Climate Action, this study, conducted by Trinomics, IEEP, Ecologic, the Austrian Environment Agency, and Carbon Counts, responds to a 2021 European Court of Auditors report. It aims to assess applying the polluter-pays principle to agricultural emissions, aligning with EU climate goals.

Current Situation: Agricultural emissions account for approximately 13.2% of the EU27’s total net GHGs. Current projections suggest stagnation in emissions, posing a challenge to meet the EU's net zero emissions target by 2050.

Rationale for Polluter Pays Principle: GHG emissions in agriculture impose social and environmental costs not reflected in market prices. Implementing polluter pays policies can internalize these costs, promoting more sustainable practices. Implementing a polluter pays policy in agriculture faces challenges such as administrative complexity, lack of consistent MRV tools, potential carbon leakage, and resistance from stakeholders due to economic insecurity and cost concerns.

Policy Options: The study incorporates five objectives into the design of polluter pays policies, including minimizing implementation burden, providing effective MRV, safeguarding against carbon leakage, fostering innovation, and ensuring fairness. Five ETS options are analyzed, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. These options range from on-farm ETS to upstream and downstream approaches, aiming to incentivize emission reductions while balancing administrative feasibility and economic impact.

Recommendations: Combinations of different design aspects from the analyzed options could be considered. Preliminary actions include establishing harmonized GHG reporting tools, providing transitional aid, and aligning CAP funds with ETS revenues.

Open Questions: The study identifies areas for further research, including the feasibility of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, implications of tariff rate quotas, impacts of marketing strategies on consumer behavior, and distributional impacts across Member States.

Viewed Articles
Pricing Agricultural Emissions and Rewarding Climate Action in the Agri-food Value Chain
European Commission| Source | Download | Introduction: Commissioned by the Commission’s Directorate General for Climate Action, this study, conducted by Trinomics, IEEP, Ecologic, the Austrian Environ
Mar 29, 2024
Read More
WRI: State of Climate Action 2023
World Resources Institute| Source | Download  |The "State of Climate Action 2023" report underscores the inadequacy of current global efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C. The majority of indicato
From Plate to Planet: How local governments are driving action on climate change through food
iPES FOOD| Source | Download |The urgency of addressing the climate crisis demands a transformative approach to food systems, a critical yet often overlooked aspect of climate action. While national g
2023 to 2027 Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy (Canada)
Government of Canada| Source | Download | The Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy aligns with Canada's 2022-2026 Federal Sustainable Development Strategy, integrating UN Sustainable Deve
OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024-2033
OECD and FAO | Source | Download | The OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024-2033 analyzes medium-term global agricultural market trends, emphasizing critical challenges like climate change, geopolitical
Agriculture and Climate Change Mitigation—Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Office of the Auditor General Canada | Source |Since 2015, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada has been tasked with addressing climate change. Despite this, a clear strategy to align with Canada’s 2030 a
TOP