Search
Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions

August 18, 2022 | Nature Climate Change | Source

Introduction: An international research consortium led by researchers from Chinese Academy of Sciences evaluates the climate chanage mitigation effects of Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) in China, quantifying the historical and projected mitigation capacity of forest and wetland conservations. 

Key findings: Historical data suggests that Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) in China mitigated around 8% of fossil CO2 emissions from 2000 to 2020. Looking ahead, projections indicate that new NCS activities could potentially offset 6% to 8% of fossil CO2 emissions during 2020–2030 and 2020–2060, with costs ranging from US$10 to US$100 per MgCO2e. However, NCS alone cannot solve climate issues; urgent priorities include energy transformation and low-carbon technology adoption. Multilevel governance strategies are essential for maximizing the synergies among various NCS pathways and achieving climate mitigation goals while ensuring ecosystem service co-benefits. Challenges include uncertainties due to climate and ecosystem shifts, limited data availability, and the need to consider co-benefits and socioeconomic factors in NCS planning and implementation.

 

Figure | Historical mitigation capacity and future NCS potential by each NCS pathway across the provinces of China. The numbers above each of the three bars for each province represent the total flux (TgCO2e yr−1) in the periods of 2000–2020, 2020–2030 and 2020–2060, respectively. AH, Anhui; BJ, Beijing; CQ, Chongqing; FJ, Fujian: GD, Guangdong; GS, Gansu; GX, Guangxi; GZ, Guizhou; HB1, Hebei; HB2, Hubei; HLJ, Heilongjiang; HN1, Hainan; HN2, Henan; HN3, Hunan; IM, Inner Mongolia; JL, Jilin; JS, Jiangsu; JX, Jiangxi; LN, Liaoning; NX, Ningxia; QH, Qinghai; SC, Sichuan; SD, Shandong; SH, Shanghai; SX1, Shaanxi; SX2, Shanxi; TJ, Tianjin; XJ, Xinjiang; XZ, Xizang; YN, Yunnan; ZJ, Zhejiang.

Viewed Articles
Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions
August 18, 2022 | Nature Climate Change | Source | Introduction: An international research consortium led by researchers from Chinese Academy of Sciences evaluates the climate chanage mitigation effec
Read More
Climate-smart agroforestry systems and practices: A systematic review of what works, what doesn’t work, and why
May, 2023 | Forest Policy and Economics | Source | Introduction: Climate-smart agroforestry (CSAF) practices offer integrated solutions to climate change, food security, and environmental degradation,
Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Indian agricultural landscape: A Meta-Analysis
August, 2023 | Ecosystem Services | Source |  Introduction: Agricultural intensification in India threatens ecosystem sustainability, with agroforestry identified as a key strategy to mitigate these i
Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health
January 3, 2024 | Nature Communications | Source | Introduction: Conventional intensive farming boosts yields but also drives GHG emissions, soil degradation, and climate vulnerability, especially in
Potential soil organic carbon sequestration vis-a-vis methane emission in lowland rice agroecosystem
August 26, 2023 | Environmental Monitoring and Assessment |  Introduction: Lowland rice systems present a well-known climate trade-off, as management practices that increase soil organic carbon (SOC)
Long-term agricultural diversification increases financial profitability, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: a second-order meta-analysis
January 26, 2026 | Nature Communications |  Introduction: While diversification is widely promoted for its multiple benefits, policymakers often question whether those benefits persist or increase ove
TOP