Search
Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions

August 18, 2022 | Nature Climate Change | Source

Introduction: An international research consortium led by researchers from Chinese Academy of Sciences evaluates the climate chanage mitigation effects of Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) in China, quantifying the historical and projected mitigation capacity of forest and wetland conservations. 

Key findings: Historical data suggests that Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) in China mitigated around 8% of fossil CO2 emissions from 2000 to 2020. Looking ahead, projections indicate that new NCS activities could potentially offset 6% to 8% of fossil CO2 emissions during 2020–2030 and 2020–2060, with costs ranging from US$10 to US$100 per MgCO2e. However, NCS alone cannot solve climate issues; urgent priorities include energy transformation and low-carbon technology adoption. Multilevel governance strategies are essential for maximizing the synergies among various NCS pathways and achieving climate mitigation goals while ensuring ecosystem service co-benefits. Challenges include uncertainties due to climate and ecosystem shifts, limited data availability, and the need to consider co-benefits and socioeconomic factors in NCS planning and implementation.

 

Figure | Historical mitigation capacity and future NCS potential by each NCS pathway across the provinces of China. The numbers above each of the three bars for each province represent the total flux (TgCO2e yr−1) in the periods of 2000–2020, 2020–2030 and 2020–2060, respectively. AH, Anhui; BJ, Beijing; CQ, Chongqing; FJ, Fujian: GD, Guangdong; GS, Gansu; GX, Guangxi; GZ, Guizhou; HB1, Hebei; HB2, Hubei; HLJ, Heilongjiang; HN1, Hainan; HN2, Henan; HN3, Hunan; IM, Inner Mongolia; JL, Jilin; JS, Jiangsu; JX, Jiangxi; LN, Liaoning; NX, Ningxia; QH, Qinghai; SC, Sichuan; SD, Shandong; SH, Shanghai; SX1, Shaanxi; SX2, Shanxi; TJ, Tianjin; XJ, Xinjiang; XZ, Xizang; YN, Yunnan; ZJ, Zhejiang.

Viewed Articles
Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions
August 18, 2022 | Nature Climate Change | Source | Introduction: An international research consortium led by researchers from Chinese Academy of Sciences evaluates the climate chanage mitigation effec
Read More
Climate-smart agroforestry systems and practices: A systematic review of what works, what doesn’t work, and why
May, 2023 | Forest Policy and Economics | Source | Introduction: Climate-smart agroforestry (CSAF) practices offer integrated solutions to climate change, food security, and environmental degradation,
An overview of underutilized benefits derived from Azolla as a promising biofertilizer in lowland rice production
January, 2023 | Heliyon | Source |  Introduction: Azolla, an aquatic fern with nitrogen-fixing capabilities through its symbiotic association with Aenabana azollae, has the potential to serve as an ec
How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal
August 30, 2019 | Global Change Biology |  Introduction: This paper is produced by an international consortium of researchers across Europe, North America, Oceania and Africa, reflecting broad experti
Blue carbon as a natural climate solution
November 1, 2021 | Nature Reviews Earth & Environment | Source | Introduction: An international research team from Australia, USA, Singapore, UK and Saudi Arabia, led by Deakin University (Australia)
Salt marsh restoration: an overview of techniques and success indicators
January 6, 2022 | Environmental Science and Pollution Research | Source |  Introduction: Salt marshes are vital coastal ecosystems that support biodiversity, store carbon and protect shorelines. Yet,
TOP