Search
Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions

August 18, 2022 | Nature Climate Change | Source

Introduction: An international research consortium led by researchers from Chinese Academy of Sciences evaluates the climate chanage mitigation effects of Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) in China, quantifying the historical and projected mitigation capacity of forest and wetland conservations. 

Key findings: Historical data suggests that Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) in China mitigated around 8% of fossil CO2 emissions from 2000 to 2020. Looking ahead, projections indicate that new NCS activities could potentially offset 6% to 8% of fossil CO2 emissions during 2020–2030 and 2020–2060, with costs ranging from US$10 to US$100 per MgCO2e. However, NCS alone cannot solve climate issues; urgent priorities include energy transformation and low-carbon technology adoption. Multilevel governance strategies are essential for maximizing the synergies among various NCS pathways and achieving climate mitigation goals while ensuring ecosystem service co-benefits. Challenges include uncertainties due to climate and ecosystem shifts, limited data availability, and the need to consider co-benefits and socioeconomic factors in NCS planning and implementation.

 

Figure | Historical mitigation capacity and future NCS potential by each NCS pathway across the provinces of China. The numbers above each of the three bars for each province represent the total flux (TgCO2e yr−1) in the periods of 2000–2020, 2020–2030 and 2020–2060, respectively. AH, Anhui; BJ, Beijing; CQ, Chongqing; FJ, Fujian: GD, Guangdong; GS, Gansu; GX, Guangxi; GZ, Guizhou; HB1, Hebei; HB2, Hubei; HLJ, Heilongjiang; HN1, Hainan; HN2, Henan; HN3, Hunan; IM, Inner Mongolia; JL, Jilin; JS, Jiangsu; JX, Jiangxi; LN, Liaoning; NX, Ningxia; QH, Qinghai; SC, Sichuan; SD, Shandong; SH, Shanghai; SX1, Shaanxi; SX2, Shanxi; TJ, Tianjin; XJ, Xinjiang; XZ, Xizang; YN, Yunnan; ZJ, Zhejiang.

Viewed Articles
Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions
August 18, 2022 | Nature Climate Change | Source | Introduction: An international research consortium led by researchers from Chinese Academy of Sciences evaluates the climate chanage mitigation effec
Read More
Optimizing cover crop practices as a sustainable solution for global agroecosystem services
November 14, 2024 | Nature Communications | Introduction: Cover crops offer multiple agroecosystem benefits including higher yields, soil carbon storage, and erosion control, but their net value is co
Quantifying the impact of climate smart agricultural practices on soil carbon storage relative to conventional management
January 15, 2024 | Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | Introduction: Claims that climate-smart agricultural practices sequester atmospheric carbon more effectively than conventional approaches lack
Good fisheries management is good carbon management
March 21, 2024 | npj Ocean Sustain | Source |  Introduction: Climate change significantly affects marine ecosystems, exacerbated by overfishing and habitat degradation, weakening the ocean's capac
Potential soil organic carbon sequestration vis-a-vis methane emission in lowland rice agroecosystem
August 26, 2023 | Environmental Monitoring and Assessment |  Introduction: Lowland rice systems present a well-known climate trade-off, as management practices that increase soil organic carbon (SOC)
Cover crops enhance soil health, crop yield and resilience of tropical agroecosystem
March 1, 2025 | Field Crops Research | Introduction: The benefits of cover crops for soil health and yield are well documented in temperate systems, but evidence from tropical, highly weathered soils
TOP