Search
Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions

August 18, 2022 | Nature Climate Change | Source

Introduction: An international research consortium led by researchers from Chinese Academy of Sciences evaluates the climate chanage mitigation effects of Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) in China, quantifying the historical and projected mitigation capacity of forest and wetland conservations. 

Key findings: Historical data suggests that Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) in China mitigated around 8% of fossil CO2 emissions from 2000 to 2020. Looking ahead, projections indicate that new NCS activities could potentially offset 6% to 8% of fossil CO2 emissions during 2020–2030 and 2020–2060, with costs ranging from US$10 to US$100 per MgCO2e. However, NCS alone cannot solve climate issues; urgent priorities include energy transformation and low-carbon technology adoption. Multilevel governance strategies are essential for maximizing the synergies among various NCS pathways and achieving climate mitigation goals while ensuring ecosystem service co-benefits. Challenges include uncertainties due to climate and ecosystem shifts, limited data availability, and the need to consider co-benefits and socioeconomic factors in NCS planning and implementation.

 

Figure | Historical mitigation capacity and future NCS potential by each NCS pathway across the provinces of China. The numbers above each of the three bars for each province represent the total flux (TgCO2e yr−1) in the periods of 2000–2020, 2020–2030 and 2020–2060, respectively. AH, Anhui; BJ, Beijing; CQ, Chongqing; FJ, Fujian: GD, Guangdong; GS, Gansu; GX, Guangxi; GZ, Guizhou; HB1, Hebei; HB2, Hubei; HLJ, Heilongjiang; HN1, Hainan; HN2, Henan; HN3, Hunan; IM, Inner Mongolia; JL, Jilin; JS, Jiangsu; JX, Jiangxi; LN, Liaoning; NX, Ningxia; QH, Qinghai; SC, Sichuan; SD, Shandong; SH, Shanghai; SX1, Shaanxi; SX2, Shanxi; TJ, Tianjin; XJ, Xinjiang; XZ, Xizang; YN, Yunnan; ZJ, Zhejiang.

Viewed Articles
Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions
August 18, 2022 | Nature Climate Change | Source | Introduction: An international research consortium led by researchers from Chinese Academy of Sciences evaluates the climate chanage mitigation effec
Read More
Opportunities for mitigating net system greenhouse gas emissions in Southeast Asian rice production: A systematic review
February 28, 2024 | Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | Source |  Introduction: Despite existing mitigation efforts, integrated approaches addressing system-wide emissions—including soil organic c
An overview of underutilized benefits derived from Azolla as a promising biofertilizer in lowland rice production
January, 2023 | Heliyon | Source |  Introduction: Azolla, an aquatic fern with nitrogen-fixing capabilities through its symbiotic association with Aenabana azollae, has the potential to serve as an ec
Soil carbon sequestration by agroforestry systems in China: A meta-analysis
August 1, 2021 | Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | Source |  Introduction: Agroforestry systems (AFS) play a vital role in soil conservation and climate change mitigation in China, yet quantitat
Mulberry based agroforestry system and canopy management practices to combat soil erosion and enhancing carbon sequestration in degraded lands of Himalayan foothills
December, 2024 | Environmental and Sustainability Indicators | Source |  Introduction: Agroforestry offers a cost-effective solution for restoring degraded mountain lands by stabilizing soil, reducing
Optimizing the rate of straw returning to balance trade-offs between carbon emission budget and rice yield in China
June, 2024 | Sustainable Production and Consumption | Source |  Introduction:  As the world's largest producer (15.4%) and consumer (21.4%) of rice, China faces the critical challenge of balancing
TOP